8 thoughts on “Top 5 Not Death of Fashion

  1. Yes, generally speaking, but these films show that there are exceptions. I’m surprised that Young Victoria is not on this list! :)

  2. Yes some looks are very severe – and those bonnets! but the sewing in the extant garments is truly beautiful … especially mid to late 1830s.

  3. I normally find 1840s dull, but not necessarily “death.” I have to say the 1981 Camille – just chef’s kiss for Isabelle Hupert’s costumes. Absolutely stunning! The two plaid dresses featured above – I think I’d make myself crazy, blind, or both trying to lay out the pattern pieces to cut the plaids so they match, and my gosh – tucks AND smocking on that central bodice! How do you even cut that to make the idea work???? As for the 1939 Camille, Robert Taylor and his bib sized cravats certainly look good. I love Garbo, but the older I get, the less I appreciate Adrian’s design work in costume dramas. The women’s gowns are beautiful, but they definitely fall into the hysterical rather than historical category. Adrian was the one who pushed for George Cukor’s version of Pride and Prejudice to get changed to mid-19th century because he found Regency era clothing boring.

    1. An opinion with at least some supporters on this website (I believe there has been at least one thread about the subject), but not one I share: blame exposure to the SHARPE television films (and their rather lively selection of leading ladies) at an impressionable age.

  4. The bodices of those dresses was cut to restrict the movement of the arms. That meant only ladies could wear them. The arms couldn’t be raised much above the waist without splitting a seam! So it marked the era when women were forced back into the kitchen and domestic affairs (not the first time or the last that happened!)

Leave a Reply to lynneconnollyuk@yahoo.co.ukCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.