24 thoughts on “Oh the Bad Movies & TV You’ll Watch 16!

  1. I tried to watch The House of Guinness the other day, and I just couldn’t make myself watch a second episode. It was so cliche and boring to me!

    1. I was laid up sick for a few days and watched it. I shouted “what is she wearing??” a few times, I definitely saw a 90s goth necklace passed off as mourning jewellery at one point, and the plot was ridiculous. The menswear was pretty decent is about the most praise I can manage.

    2. Thanks for the warning; a friend thought we should watch it for our Sunday frock-flicks evening, and I sensed that this would be a bad choice. (OT: Americans romanticize Guinness; there are much better stouts being made right here.)

    3. And then there is all the really violent acts perpetrated and so many. I found it overwhelming in a short time.

  2. I remember watching ‘First Churchills’ which prompted a great deal of reading up on the era. Like the original ‘Forsythe Saga’ and ‘The Pallisers’ (all with Susan Hampshire) they were stage-y but typical of the time. Standouts when there was a lot of junk on American tv.

  3. I did enjoy Emma Mackey’s Madame X dress and hair trinket in Eiffel, tho we don’t see enough of it, but the rest of the movie annoyed me so much, Emma being a good 20 years too young for the role being one of them

  4. My first thought about La Rafle was; It’s better to watch Sarah’s Key, which covered the same topic but in a beautiful and tragic way. It was very faithful to the book too.

    I am still going to look up The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, just because I want to learn her facinating story.

    I’m on the fence regarding Nuremberg. I like both lead actors but the reviews I have seen are very mixed.

    1. I’d highly recommend the book that the Henrietta Lacks film was based on. It’s a nonfiction book by Rebecca Skloot, and Sklott adapted a large amount from journals kept by Lacks’s daughter Deborah.

  5. I liked Nuremberg a lot, but it’s definitely one to watch for the history and the performances, not the costumes, since 99% of it is various 1940s men’s suits and military uniforms. (Also my tiniest of tiny nitpick but while I understand that Leo Woodall’s character was a real person, with an immensely fascinating and tragic story, I did not buy that after only four years of living in the US as a late teens/early 20s man, he would have developed such a flawless Chicago accent that other Americans would be surprised to learn he was originally from Germany).

  6. I was really impressed by the costumes in Nuremberg. the high point for me was Michael Shannon (as Justice Robert Jackson) in his morning dress courtroom attire. I fell in love.

  7. I guess you had to watch The First Churchills when it first came out. I rewatched it in the 2000s and it wasn’t the same, then probably again more recently. Still, I loved it at the time (it was an intro to the history for me), and I love Margaret Tyzack as Queen Anne so much.

    1. I watched it the first time and yes, it completely began my fascination with English history. I watched it again and yes, it has 1960s videography and the sets are basic, but the acting is superb and the costumes are at least a strong attempt to be on target for the entire period from 1675-1712 – with all the fashion changes that period had. Margaret Tyzack was excellent as Queen Anne – (I didn’t like the caricature of her which Olivia Colman portrayed- actually I simply don’t like The Favourite at all!). Susan Hampshire gives us a fully rounded Sarah, certainly no a perfect person, but very human. And I do love John Standing as Godolphin – he and Sarah were that not very common thing at that time- a man and a woman who really were friends!

  8. Thanks for another edition of this series! Your effort is appreciated. I completely agree re. “Hundred Years of Solitude,” I loved the book but have zero interest in watching the series. The magical realism style works so much better as prose.

  9. In along came love, french actor Vincent Lacoste plays the husband.
    He is also the new Valmont in the Merteuil series.

  10. I’m not saying any film or tv series about the Eiffel Tower SHOULD be a comedy strongly hinting that this iconic bit of French symbolism grew up from purely-Freudian roots (“We ‘ave lost yet another war, ‘ow so we prove we remain a Fatherland and not a Motherland?”), but if you’re going to throw a love triangle in there anyway, somebody is going to make the connection anyway.

    “BEHOLD, Ma Cherie, how much and how long I shall love you!”

    “Monsieur, what sort of girl do you think I am? Why should I settle for the cold, brutal steel of a mere engineer when I can be slathered in oils by a fine artist?”

    “… do you mean painted in oils?”

    “Something like that.”

  11. I am not sure if I’m going to watch Nuremberg, but if you are interested in some really fascinating side stories (including an army officer (? I can’t recall exactly) who managed to get himself assigned to the trial who was on the side of the Nazis, I highly recommend the podcast “Rachel Maddow presents Ultra” which covers this and then some. The parallels to what is going on right now is uncanny.

  12. Yikes! Love triangle — Eiffel Tower ?

    That’s not even a metaphor, that’s just right there. Maybe they should have titled it ;) instead.

Comments are closed.