12 thoughts on “MCM: Richard III

  1. olivier s is the best and costumes are sumptuous. would have gladly strutted around the court adorned in those clothes

  2. I know you say Richard “probably” killed his nephews — but the problem there is the absence of bodies. It’s the same problem if you think Henry VII killed the princes. Neither Richard nor Henry was stupid, and if you’re a usurping or conquering king, you eliminate the heirs of the previous king. And you display their bodies so they are SEEN to be dead. If you don’t, you risk pretenders rising up against you, which is exactly what happened in Henry’s reign.

    So I don’t think either Richard OR Henry killed the princes. If they had, they’d have displayed their bodies and said how tragic it was that they died of a fatal hangnail.

    But as always, that leaves us with the same question: Who killed the Princes in the Tower?

    1. Good points, but still, Occam’s razor says Richard was probably responsible. I think the real question is, WHAT HAPPENED to the Princes? We assume they were killed, but maybe they died and no bodies were displayed b/c whoever was responsible was embarrassed/afraid they’d get into trouble? Maybe they did escape? I’d love to know!

      1. I think it more likely R3 had them quietly removed (alive) and sent to one of his Northern castles to join their various young cousins. Or to his sister, the Duchess of Burgundy, in what is now Belgium and the Netherlands. In any case, Henry Tudor had better reason to have the boys murdered than Richard did: he was supposed to marry their older sister, and discovery of the boys would have cost him the throne. Annette Carson’s “The Maligned King” is a good exploration of the era’s politics and alliances.

  3. Ian McKellen was my first introduction to the character/person (outside of a brief snippet of Steve Cumyn, playing Alec Guinness, as Richard III in the Historica Canada segment about the establishment of the Stratford Theatre Festival: https://www.historicacanada.ca/productions/minutes/stratford) so it will always be my favourite portrayal, though Olivier is of course a close second.

    Interestingly although the film seems to be borrowing heavily from Nazi/fascist imagery, McKellen was actually inspired by fascism in England in the 1930s, including the fact that Edward VIII may have had Nazi sympathies.

  4. I don’t think the 1995 Richard III is meant to be set in 1930s Germany; as I understand it from statements by the creators, it’s supposed to be an alternate 1930s Britain sliding into fascism, with McKellen’s version of Richard partially based on real 1930s British fascist leader Oswald Mosley.

Leave a Reply to India EdghillCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.