9 thoughts on “TBT: The House of Mirth (2000)

  1. I’ve never seen it. But I LOVE Eric Stoltz. Since it’s so depressing, maybe watching on mute is the way to go. I adore Edwardian fashion.

  2. I watched it once. NEVER AGAIN. Was it beautiful to look at? Absolutely. Gillian Anderson was stunning and she was terrific in the role. But as you said, Trystan, it was super depressing. Oh well, that’s Edith Wharton for you. :)

  3. Being a coward, I shall relish these screenshots and skip the film: life is to short to endure the miseries of past ages by proxy.

  4. Probably one of my favorite adaptations of all time. It’s beautiful, extremely well-acted (if not cast – Dan Aykroyd is a bit odd for me), and Gillian Anderson absolutely devastated me. The costumes are amazing. A real shame there aren’t higher quality caps!

  5. I’m sure the movie is gorgeous, but I also know the story is the opposite of mirthful. I need to be in a much better headspace before I consider watching.

  6. I had the DVD but finally donated it because I couldn’t watch it again ,it is too sad…but it’s beautiful and well-acted. Lily was in the worst position a woman could be…unmarried and poor but with wealthy friends. When she had chances to marry rich men she couldn’t bring herself to accept . It is the most depressing of Whartons works to me.

  7. I have seen it more than once, and I ADORE the costuming. Apparently, some of the pieces are actual clothing and corsetry of the period, which Gillian Anderson complained about because her corsets were laced too tight. This is how period dramas should be.

  8. A minor note: one of the characters in the novel is named Carrie Fisher. Which makes my mental image of her scenes when I’m reading the book a bit bizarre! However, this doesn’t happen often, as the novel is so damn depressing I rarely re-read it, and I always want to smack Lily Bart for being such an idiot.

Feel the love

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.