You guys. I was all excited for the next iteration of Snark Week, and I thought, “Aha! I will watch Scarlett, the ill-fated sequel to Gone With the Wind written by a different author in the 1980s, critically panned, and then adapted into a critically panned miniseries in 1994!” I mean, it’ll be comedy gold, right? DAMMIT IF I DIDN’T ENJOY THE FRICKIN’ THING. Oh, there’s shmaltz. There are a few (very few) costume mis-steps. There are truckloads of brown makeup on Every Single Actress. There’s ridiculous, made-up drama. But you know what? I LOVED 95% of the costumes, and I eagerly looked forward to each of the four episodes. MY CREDIBILITY IS RUINED!!!
Let’s get this out of the way: Joanne Whalley is no Vivien Leigh. Timothy Dalton is no Clark Gable. But in terms of their acting, yeah, they kind of nail the parts (as written). Whalley gets Scarlett’s head tossing, and she’s good at bringing the maturity that the story calls for. Dalton’s chin cleft is mesmerizing (and not in a good way), but he really channels Rhett’s cheroot-chewing, devil-may-care, teasing rake. (Although too bad this series wasn’t made today, because imagine George Clooney as Rhett!)
Ashley Wilkes is just as much of a drip as ever.
Ann-Margret as Belle Watling is HILARIOUSLY bad, but I’m entertained by bad acting.
New characters include Anne Hampton (played by Annabeth Gish) as the new Melanie (quite good)…
…and Jean Smart (the blonde from Designing Women) as the ludicrous Sally, all tomboy brashness. Apparently Jean is allowed to run her buggy into another, literally smashing it to bits, and no-one cares that she doesn’t stop. No consequences! Oh isn’t she charming.
Sean Bean’s character is preposterously OTT, but then, this is channeling 1930s melodrama, so shouldn’t he be? And really, any excuse to hear Sean Bean talk — rowr. I’d forgotten how sexy his voice is.
And let us not forget Colm Meaney, who is fine in his role, just — we’re going to Ireland, of course we are contractually obliged to cast Colm Meaney!
The story IS preposterous, although 1) so is the original GWTW, and 2) it’s trying to channel the OTT-ness of 1930s melodrama, and 3) the book on which it’s based is in some ways worse (um, Scarlett moves to Ireland, decides she no longer cares about the mythical TARA, and gives up wearing corsets for good? I think not). I think the top shmaltzy moment is when Rhett is exercising a horse in the middle of the night (as one does), and then imagines Scarlett riding the horse in a diaphanous nightgown. I do believe I spit water I was laughing so hard.
Racially, it’s nearly as tone-deaf as GWTW, although in a different way. All of the African American characters are beloved by the white people, adore the white people right back, and are happy to be swept to the sidelines. Shrill nitwit Prissy is replaced by Pansy (Rakie Ayola), but she’s utterly nondescript.
Big Sam is there, jolly as ever, and happily successful in business — there’s no racist culture of violence in the South of Scarlett, oh no!
There’s even some revisionism — despite Margaret Mitchell removing the “N” word for the almost-as-bad “darkies” shortly before publication, there’s a scene in which an Irish character explains the word “paddy” to Scarlett as being akin to the “N” word, and she protests, “I would NEVEH use that word!” Sure you wouldn’t, Scarlett. Sure you wouldn’t. (Note: I’m not saying Scarlett ever did use that word in the books or movie. Just that Scarlett suddenly proclaiming that this word is verboten, when racism completely underlies the original book and movie, is ludicrous. Sorry, if you’re going to update a racist classic, you have to deal with your history.) And, Scarlett goes to visit family in Ireland and gets a bit political about the whole English situation, but doesn’t seem to see any parallels to the South.
Costumes in Scarlett
The costumes were designed by Marit Allen (Snow White: A Tale of Terror, Ride With the Devil, Love in the Time of Cholera) and cover 1873 to 1877.
The Good – There’s Lots of It!
Okay So It Isn’t All Perfect
For one thing, the film jumps around a bit in terms of silhouette — Scarlett will be wearing a larger-skirted, hooped bustle silhouette (1869-72ish) in one scene, then a natural form silhouette (1877-1879ish) then next. But more importantly…
I mentioned brown makeup above. I didn’t mean brownface, I just mean that clearly the makeup designer(s) thought that using brown and orange tones for the applied-with-a-trowel makeup would read as “natural.” And it kind of works, until you see people in close-up, and shudder.
And it’s not just Scarlett:
While the hair was mostly great, there were some times when somebody got a little too enthusiastic with the Aquanet:
There were a few semi-ugly dresses:
And early on, Scarlett and Rhett attend a masquerade ball. Scarlett is dressed as Elsa from Frozen a Snow Queen, and while I know they did sometimes wear fancy dress costumes that didn’t follow fashionable lines, her sleek, medieval-style dress seemed a bit much. Meanwhile Rhett was dressed as the worst Renfaire pirate EVER (although Scarlett does tease him about how ridiculous he looks, which, yes).
And while yes, while you need to costume prostitutes to look like prostitutes, Ann-Margret and her trusty sidekick are designed with a sledgehammer.
So. Yeah. What objectively cheesy movies do you secretly love?
I hated the sequel and missed the miniseries with the intention of not seeing it. Wife beating British aristos and you’re right. If you don’t have a title, tiaras are verboten.
Besides they got Ireland wrong…
Actually the rules of tiaras are that they’re a married woman thing, as opposed to a titled thing. It’s perfectly acceptable for an untitled woman to wear a tiara, especially to be presented at court, as it’s part of the traditional, ultra-formal ball gown kind of uniform worn on those occasions. A tiara was de rigueur for a ball, like white tie and tails, married lady wouldn’t dream of going to court (even just a viceregal court) without a tiara, it would be like going commando at a wedding, you’d feel undressed.
Undressed, or awesome?
I’m pretty sure I watched the sequel but I can’t remember a damn thing about it! Clearly I need to revisit!
Ah, rum rasin lipstick and “smokey eyes”. I miss the grunge inspired natural make up look of the 90’s. We all looked like we stepped off a cheesy soap opera.
I remember being excited to watch this mini-series on the star power of Whalley alone. I feel in love with her in the TV movie version of Tess of the D’Urbervilles. I adore Tom Hardy novels. Lol
Ok, brain freeze, Catherine Zeta-Jones played Eustatia Vye in Return of the Native. Joanne Whalley was in Willow. Thinking back I remember an article stating Zeta-Jones would have been a better choice for Scarlett.
I LOVE WILLOW! Val Kilmer is so hot in that. I don’t know about Zeta-Jones for Scarlett… maybe!
I loved it! But yeah, the makeup is awful!
As I recall, some of the costumes were the real deal– museum pieces. Searching in archives might provide more insight
I knew I recognized that last gown from the Buccaneers…http://www.recycledmoviecostumes.com/VictorianEdwardian022.html
I enjoyed Scarlett the book, but in it, Sally is described as an ugly, monkey-faced woman, which is why she gets away with all her masculine attributes. Jean Smart is much too attractive to pull that off. They should have cast Zelda Rubinstein (Tangina in Poltergeist) instead!
As with everything Timothy Dalton is in… I loved it. I only realize it nowadays, how lovely the customes are… Need to rewatch it.
Actually, I prefer this version to Ripley’s novel, which I thought ended on an anti-climatic and almost dull note. However, I found the second half of Part 3 a bit on the dull side.
Where can I see the whole movie helppppppp meeee ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜