SNARK WEEK: “Reign” Is Not Your Average Quinceañera

Our ultimate Snark Week throw-down is happening right now, between The Tudors and Reign (I am contractually obligated to insist that you vote RIGHT NOW if you haven’t), two television shows will go down in infamy for tossing the history baby out with the bathwater. The Tudors, obviously, paved the way for Reign, so it’s not surprising that Reign decided to turn historical inaccuracy to 11 in order to distinguish itself further from anything remotely historical in the plot. I’m going to even concede to Tudors the fact that at the very least, the show writers skimmed a history book or two in order to get the basics before peeing all over the lives of these people in the name of sex, drugs, and wild madrigal orgies.

So, for me, the biggest issue I have with Reign is that (everyone say it with me now) MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS WAS A REDHEAD. A six-foot-tall redhead, no less (sound like anyone we know?), who had all the things that made her a threat to my homegirl, QEI. She was taller, more redheaded, 10 years younger, FRONCH by upbringing (if not birth), legitimate, Roman Catholic and related to a couple different popes by marriage as well as blood, and apparently fertile as the day is long and really had no problem with marriage. In short, she was a major force to contend with as a reigning monarch, especially when she was the next door neighbor of England. Where Elizabeth was all about trying reign as a king and dodge the marriage/heir issue for as long as possible, Mary played the part of a Renaissance princess perfectly and–as Trystan likes to endlessly remind me–that made her a serious problem for England.

But I’m getting away from the whole issue at hand, and that is, once you realize how few fucks are given in Reign as to the basics of Mary Stuart, the human being, WHAT THE EVER LOVING HELL IS UP WITH THE COSTUMES IN REIGN???

But even that isn’t really what this post is about. No… This post isn’t about analyzing the costumes, or the arguing about the designer’s “influences” or whatever bullshit is out there right now trying to justify the total schizophrenic approach to this series (is it a historical drama, or 90210 Goes To The Ren Faire? PICK ONE AND STICK WITH IT, FFS.). Nope, this post is actually about the clothes in the show and how, despite the fact that we have all been derisively sneering at them as cut-rate budget formals apparently bought from Ye Olde Prom Shack, the clothing that appears on Reign is so far out of our collective budgets as to be even more ridiculous when trying to wrap our heads around the network’s vision for this show.

Let’s take a little tour of some of the outfits in the show, so far:

This abomination HAS to be something we’d expect to see on sale at David’s Bridal:

Nope. It’s a fucking Marchesa gown, and it can be yours for the low, low price of all six months of your paychecks combined:

Ok, so what about this one?

Yeah, you probably won’t be caught dead in it, but only because it’s a freaking Oscar de la Renta, and you can’t even afford to stand in the same room as it, let alone put it on:

Ok, fine, so what about this fugtastic jacket, huh?

That’s not FUG, people. That’s an Alexander McQueen, and even on sale, it cost more than my first car:

Ok, so these are all clearly expensive ballgowns and jackets, what about this sad little peasant blouse? Did she find it in a Goodwill bin two hours before she was expected to wear something to the Ren Faire?

Yeah, it’s pretty hideous, but sadly, it too is an Alexander McQueen and costs $950:

I could go on and on, but I think instead I’ll point you to ShopYourTV.com which has a full 8 pages worth of posts on where to find/buy most of the clothes, jewelry, and accessories you see on Reign. I hope this post has prepared you prepared for the sticker shock, though.

Got any favorite clothing abominations from Reign? Unleash your snark in the comments!