33 thoughts on “SNARK WEEK: A Knight’s Tale of Woe or 5 Reasons Why A Knight’s Tale Sucks

  1. This movie makes me laugh, cringe and wriggle with snarky delight. I despise the women’s costumes, and have been known to have a glass of wine and scream at the screen with snarky delight. My favorite part is snarking and rocking out with the movie. It is one of my favorite guilty pleasures, but mostly because I get to yell at it.

    1. I will admit that, other than a fun game of “Count the anachronisms,” the main thing I like about this movie is the fact that it has Heath Ledger in it, and the man was GORGEOUS.

  2. Hideous, horrible, horrifying, heinous, awful. I ran out of h words. Maddeningly bad costuming. Meh story. Scary-thin lead actress. Some really good actors is the best that can be said. Although they really should expunge this piece of crap from their “l did this” lists. But hey, everyone has to earn a living. Just a head-shaker all around.

  3. I just can’t even, and have never been able to, with this film. Despite my best efforts, it was sprung upon me by some well-meaning friends and I actually had to watch it. I lost a part of my transverse colon that day which I don’t believe I’ve ever recovered.

  4. Yeah but you get to see Paul Bettany’s butt soooo…..

    I was actually working on a snarky watchalong of this movie in conjunction with the blog Got Medieval and had all kinds of Thoughts to share on the costumes, but it never ended up happening and that blog has been defunct for a while now. Sad day!

    1. I *big puffy heart* Got Medieval & miss it. A watchalong with this movie would have been brilliant — it’s never too late….

  5. It’s so great to meet someone else who hates this movie as much as I do. This was actually the only film that pissed me off so much I ended up walking out of the movie theater (it was the scene where Blacksmith Girl proudly shows off the Nike swoosh– YAY CORPORATIONS RULE, or something). The tonal shifts were jarring, and it seems, as you said, they didn’t know what they were going for. I love REIGN and GALAVANT so it’s not like I can’t deal with goofy costumes when I feel it works with the material.

    Man, even now the female lead’s costumes make me want to stab my eyeball with a fork…

    1. I’ve been loving Galavant because it is mostly genuinely funny, & Reign, while I snark on it too, it straight up admits it’s not trying to be anything other than a teenage soap opera. These 2 set the bar appropriately. A Knight’s Tale is *such* a mishmash, silly at one minute, trying to be serious the next. Also, gawd-awful on the eyes all around!

  6. Oddly enough, the hat with the loop is the bastard offspring of a real 14th century hat- specifically, a hennin. However, in the original the “gauze” was 100 EPI 5 Momme silk, worth a leading role in a King’s ransom. How the designer got from that to this should, in any reasonable world, have involved at least a Lost Weekend and some primo LSD.

  7. I think I really lost it after the Nike swoosh thing. At first I was just confused, after that I was between NOPE and howling with laughter.

    Also, sort of unrelated, but now that I know of the existence of the Unfortunate Biggingses, I realise, much to my horror, I made one for a play I took part in Uni. Strangely enough, the Unfortunate Biggings was the only piece that was not recovered. I think it was a message from the Costume gods.

  8. OMD, I (not so) secretly LOVE this movie! It’s crazy, and insane, and not even trying to be period. And yet the tournaments are scored completely accurately. I felt that they were trying to show how the jousters were considered rock stars of their time. Instead of choosing modern rock music that might have flopped, they went with 70’s Rock that everyone knows and can enjoy. The tunics were like grunge.
    And how can you not love the Wat and his apoplectic rage and frustration?
    To me, it’s so terrible it’s great! But I can’t hold it against the haters. I mean, my best description of First Knight was a giant waste of fabric. To each their own. :)

    1. Michael Hirst, creator of Showtime’s “The Tudors,” said he wanted to portray Henry VIII as a rockstar so a younger audience could understand the king’s influence & importance. And “Reign” is obviously dressing Mary Queen of Scots & her court in modern designer clothes so that the CW’s young female demographic identifies with the characters. Does this work? Is it ok? Is it bastardizing history? Those are bigger questions, which we’re happy to engage in (& are planning more in-depth essays about).

      No matter what, doing this kind of modern take on history opens up a movie/TV show for SNARK all the live-long day :)

      FWIW, I was raised on Monty Python, & I totally dig watching “Reign.” But “A Knight’s Tale” made me hurl things at the screen bec., as I said above, I didn’t find it either funny OR fun to look at.

      1. Both, and more, are totally worthy of snark, and snark is worthy of being indulged in.

        I recoil from the Tudors and Reign, but I guess it may be the difference between a nod to classic rockstar themes vs. contemporary rockstar ideals. I was gonna say that maybe the fictional characters were more fun than bastardized versions of real people, except the whole Black Prince thing. Anyway, hate and snark away, and enjoy. Just try not to think less of those who love it as a guilty pleasure. :)

  9. I HATE Reign, the first time I saw Megan Follows in that, well I don’t really understand what the dress was supposed to be, I turned it off. Then again, I am 30 and out of the demographic. I love period dramas, I want to see historical costumes, that are as accurate as the can be. But when I have run out of good movies, and finish Willow, Princess Bride and the 13th Warrior, I try to watch A Knights Tale, because hey, it has sword fighting. And as bad as this movie is, it can’t be as bad as The Eagle.

  10. My friends- the hennin with the forehead loop is a 15th century style, not 14th. So even when this film accidentally gets it right, it’s off by a century.
    Those who know me know I’m primarily an armor nerd and a lover of all things medieval, but only to a point. I’ve seen the trailer and bits of this film on TV by accident, but never watched the entire film on purpose. By the same token, I’ve never intentionally cut myself with a serrated knife and poured hot salsa into the wound, even though I love hot salsa. The thing that sealed its fate in my eyes was a brief shot of a 16th-century close-helm–the kind that locks in place around the wearer’s chin and neck so IT CAN’T COME OFF–flying through the air in slow motion after a jousting impact. This is on par with Ted telling Bill, “I fell out of my armor when I hit the ground!” Run away screaming.

  11. Woh, it took me so long to scroll down here that I almost lost the will to live, let alone post a comment, but rest assured oh loyal Internet pals, I made it. I’m here and ready to spot put some sarcasm-loaded opinions.

    I actually really like this movie. It appeals to the Add, easily distracted, 80’s punk-rocking historian within. I love the movie for all those reasons you just listed. I like is split direction and varying level of feels I love the slapdash way the movie is portrayed, I adore the acting (and the often lack there of) and I honestly felt like this movie accomplished everything it set out to. It was entertaining and thought provoking, it brought up curiosity and intrigue.
    I get why you don’t like it, as a history major I will agree there are many cringe worthy moments, but the way I figure it, I’d rather watch a movie that’s blatant about how unrealistic it is, then stare at a bunch of stuffy actors covertly destroying my mental projections of historical events.

    Welp, that’s all for me,

  12. While agreeing with every negative comment, I confess to enjoying this film enough to watch it more than once. The anachronisms of music, hats and celebrity contribute to the general tone of insane desperation.

  13. I always liked to think of this movie was set in an Alternative universe medieval England. That is the only thing that made the costumes make any sense to me.

  14. The man in armour (a knight ?) behind Bettany!Chaucer is also wearing a burgonet helmet. If this is the 14th century, that’s out of place, as burgonets are a 16th and 17th century thing.

  15. I believe the problem may be the movie is NOT trying to be historically accurate in the least. We’re supposed to laugh at the modern day references, such as the Nike brand, the Mexican wave, or Jocelyn’s hat. It’s a comedy that someone loves and someone hates, but taking its costuming seriously is just completely out of place, IMO. I saw it when I was ten and already back then I asked my mother if Nike existed during the Middle Ages. Of course not! You don’t have to study history to know that. This movie is not trying to fool anybody.

  16. Pretty much nailed it- the time I wasted watching that thing is time I’ll never get back. Personally, I hate modern/historical mashups as a general rule.

  17. Every single thing you say is true. And I don’t care! The minute I saw that medieval tournament audience rocking to ‘We Will Rock You’ I knew I was watching fantasy and enjoyed it as such.

  18. You’re all a bunch of faggots! This movie was fun and interesting and really enjoyable! Don’t be a douchecanoe!

  19. Being a mad medieval history nut I love anything that can help me escape the horrors of my modern hell. Yes, I know, poverty, medicine, reality bla bla bla, I know the benefits of living now so no more lectures please. Anyway, I digress.
    As soon as I saw the awful clothes, modern makeup and hair and heard the music I was so disappointed.
    A good idea ruined by someone thinking this mismatch of ages and eras would be a good thing.
    Whoever had this monstrosity of a vision should never be let near anything with an historical script or idea ever again.
    Ruined, murdered, destroyed, killed, and shat upon from a great height.
    Who are you and why did you do this? What possessed you to do this? Why, where, when, how did you ever think that this would be a good idea, a good thing to do?
    Shame on you.
    You murdered this film.

  20. I feel that one must understand the social attitudes of the time the movie came out before mocking old films.It was 2001, people were more fun and movies regardless of period added that modern rave/punk/edgy style to some degree and it was FUN. Being so meticulous and expecting absolute historical accuracy in movie costumery is such fussy old attitude to take with movies. Sure, if a film was based on a true story then historical accuracy should take precedence over creativity but a knights tale is a fantasy. Think back to the early 2000s and try and remember a more adventurous and more creative approach to movie costumes and even your own style back then, you’ll find its much more nostalgic and interesting than nitpicking at old movie costumes. Peace😎

Comments are closed.

Discover more from Frock Flicks

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading