8 thoughts on “Watch Miss Austen (2025) on PBS!

  1. Interesting – I’ve been doing quite a bit of research into this story for a guided walk around Kintbury where the story is (mostly) set and Fulwar Fowle, who is dying at the beginning of the story, died in 1840 making it a good 10 years after the story is said to be set, so maybe the fashions are more mid 1830’s and the drabness suits the rural settings and melancholy scenes. As you pointed out, it is only in the flashbacks that we get colour and that Yellow pelisse, made as a gift by Jane to her sister, really suits the young Cassie.

    1. I’ve read the book, and the book is definitely set in the 1840s. Much of the story revolves around everyone seeing Cassandra as a frail old lady. (She died IRL in 1845 at 72.)

      I think the adaptation moved the setting of the story to the 1830s because Keeley Hawes is most definitely NOT a frail old lady, lol.

  2. I watched it in two evenings. It was very boring and dramatic, surprisingly even without a plot.
    Keeley Hawes overacted and made faces that were completely out of character for her age and the character of her silent, reasonable heroine Cassandra. It seems the actress forgot that she is no longer the young, selfish flirt from Wives and Daughters.
    The yellow outfit is very beautiful, but it looks absolutely modern. Looks like it was borrowed from the wardrobe on the Bridgerton set.
    And for God’s sake, explain to me why two sisters turned down not vile tyrants, but very nice, kind young men who would not interfere with either the literary activities of one, or the communication with the sisters of the other?

  3. I watched episode one and the show was not super engaging, but I do like Ms Hawes.

    YES! I have been a monthly PBS supporter for many years now and am considering increasing my gift because of the current political climate. We watch this channel all the time at home, for all kinds of shows. There is usually something interesting to watch. Please peeps, support them if you can!

  4. Haven’t watched yet, but am giving a full throated YES to supporting your local PBS! And double check to see if your employer offers a charitable match as well!

  5. Definite yes for supporting PBS; I’ve given an ongoing monthly contribution for a few years now. More important now than ever; if I could afford it, I’d raise my contribution, but unfortunately in these straitened times, my corporate overlords have cut our labor hours. As far as this series, gee. Mildly disappointing. For me, it wasn’t terribly engaging until the flashbacks began. After the first episode I began to wonder if Jane Austen didn’t purposely name her two most annoying fictional sisters Mary because of her r/l s-i-l. The 1830s costumes remind me a bit of the 1983 BBC Jane Eyre, although the ’83 series sleeveheads were more properly scaled up. As that is a favorite period series, I don’t mind the throwback. I don’t understand the reason for having Isabella in what appear to be flat out Regency dresses, or the nosey maid for that matter, unless that was a subliminal declaration of the Fowles financial straits, signifying that Isabella had no money for new clothes. I’m not totally engrossed by the series, but I suppose I’d better finish it as a demonstration that I’m an Austenite and to continue supporting period drama over ubiquitous murder mysteries. I’m finding this series a bit dull, BUT it’s still a hundred times better than the awful Netflix “Persuasion” or “Bridgerton,” which I hate watch just so I know what my friends are talking about. It was cute seeing “Dean Thomas,” from the Harry Potter films, in period costume. The frock coats and stovepipe hat suited him.

Comments are closed.