8 thoughts on “Bridgerton Season 4 Costume Thoughts

  1. I hated S3 : those fake-Chanel tweeds were ugly, and some other dresses right from 1950 ! Weird!
    I enjoyed this season much more. Many sequins though! Michaela’s dresses looked as New year’s eve party dresses!
    What was that corset ( french = guêpière) basque? on Violet !?
    I liked Posy’s outfits and loved her character.
    And Cressida is Cressida. Love or leave.

  2. I found the red sequined dress on Michaela very distracting especially since they were not in fashion until the 1920s. There was at least one other but it is the red one that really put me off.

  3. I was prepared to hate this season based on the images released of the Masquerade Ball! but overall, I didn’t! That said: Eloise=Joan of Arc, Groundbreaking! Now I see the subtle bits of shine added to Araminta’s clothing, I still find her wardrobe mostly boring! There’s a portrait of Victoria, Dowager Duchess of Kent in ca. 1819/20 with a sweetheart neckline and a bit of lace at said neckline! That would’ve suited Araminta, except make her lace black! Sophie’s dress was boring AF! Usually Cinderella gowns are 10/10 stunners, to signal transformation!

  4. You forgot to mention we saw our first ever Bridgerton shift/chemise! Sophie wears one in at least two scenes. Granted, it has spaghetti straps, but at least one lady is smart enough to wear a protective layer between her skin and her corset!

  5. I really enjoyed this season costume wise! Such a breath of fresh air in comparison with 3. Also really glad they came back from the over the top makeup last season. The makeup was so understated this season some people almost seemed to be barefaced, and I loved it! So much better than the heavy eyeshadow of season 3.

    Still sad though that they gave Pen the same 60s silhouette dresses as her mother… It all feels so stiff and forced.

  6. Wait, Ms Katie Leung is old enough to play a mother with daughters of a marriageable age? (It’s not so chilling as the thought that DOCTOR WHO’s new star was actually younger than I am, but it’s almost as startling).

    CATCHES SIGHT OF CRESSIDA –

    Good grief, that dress would give Percy Blakeney conniptions; it might actually crack his quizzing glass; it could even make him wonder if the Aristocracy is really worth it.

    That is a dress that belongs in a museum so that it’s historical context can be properly contextualised and it’s crimes against Humanity hidden from the light of open day.

    Or possibly in a stage pantomime, it really could go either way (Just so long as it goes a very long way away from ME).

  7. I loved the costume ball and didn’t expect anything approaching accuracy. Almost fitting that the mean sister got the Marie Antoinette necklace (that she didn’t really buy). I find I can tolerate costumes worn by Eloise and Mama B (except for the lingerie. Tap pants. Really?). Francesca’s mourning attire was appropriate and beautiful, but the missing hair pins. * sigh * I liked this season’s plot lines better than previous seasons, but still not as good as the stand alone Queen Charlotte series. Cressida. Oy. No words. Anyone else wondering if Eloise is now filling Lady Whistledown’s shoes? She’s subdued enough in her wardrobe that she can sort of blend into the wallpaper and no one will think of her, as it’s been awhile since she came out. I’m just thinking I don’t know what they could possibly do visually to make it interesting for viewers so that we get through Gregory and Hyacinth. Although maybe 1820s bonkers extant fashion plates and museum garments means that the designers go nuts and genuinely lose whatever restraint they were operating under???

Leave a Reply to EmmaCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.