13 thoughts on “Preview: King and Conqueror (2025)

  1. I completely agree with you about James Norton. And Coster-Waldau. I encourage them to get it right, but will probably forgive them if they don’t. Because of the casting.

    1. Coster-Waldau AND Norton? Whew. They might compensate for what looks like mediocre costuming and hair. When will W the C import coconuts to England?

  2. I just watched watched Lucy Worsley Investigates : William the Conqueror (Season 2, Ep. 3) and do not remember seeing any leather pants. :)

  3. They seem to have given Harold Godwinson a clean shave and a short back and sides, and Bastard Billy a moustache and shaggy locks. Which is the direct opposite of real-life 11th century custom.

  4. I want the correct haircut on William! And that ain’t it! I’m disappointed in the whole endeavor- which is a shame because this is one heck of a dramatic story! Well, maybe it will be better than it seems (doubt it though)

  5. Colder-Waldau is too old to play William the Conqueror. True, he at 55 probably looks much better than the historical William did in his late 30s, but it doesn’t make sense if he’s playing the upstart invader, younger than Harold Godwinson.

  6. Help, help, I’m being repressed! Now we see the violence inherent in the system!

    I’m going to watch when it comes to the US. Because, ya know, James Norton and Jamie Lannister.

  7. How do you know he’s the king?
    Because he hasn’t got shit all over him.

    I’m going to watch when it comes to the US because, hellp, James Norton and Jamie Lannister.

  8. In addition to the ages not really matching up, between the actors/ historical characters, their hairstyles/ facial hair are entirely on the wrong people; Nikolaj is playing William the Conqueror {Guilliame le Batarde, as he was known at the time}- a Norman – they were not known for their moustaches, the Anglo-Saxons were (as well as their fastidious grooming of said moustaches & hair).
    The 5 o’clock shadow & short tousled curls on Harold also just feels odd.
    I have nothing against the casting, for the most part – but the hair would have been a pretty simple way to differentiate between the sides…

  9. I am now on episode 5 of this and it is RIPE for Snark Week. They only have mud for dye, everything is underlit, they go to the coronation of Edward the Confessor and don’t even bother washing their faces.

    I am pretty sure the only time I saw colour it was a shade of green more reminiscent of aniline dyes than anything historical.

    The fights are gritty and realistic, the horses seem much smaller than usually get used in productions like these so they are closer to historical standards, but the sets and the costumes and the general grubbiness is really awful. The script is stilted and weird. It also did two of my pet hates – ignored the role of Scotland, and portrayed the Kingdom of Northumbria as a rocky hellscape.

    How do you make this period of history uninteresting? :/

Leave a Reply to JoanneCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.